College comparison
A side-by-side of acceptance rate, test scores, and cost — source-cited estimates, not guarantees. Want the number that actually matters for your student? Model your admit odds at each.
| Metric | MIT Cambridge, MA | Stanford Stanford, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rateStanford University is more selective | 5% | 4% |
| SAT (25–75) | 1520–1580 | 1510–1580 |
| ACT (25–75) | — | — |
| Undergrad enrollment | 4,535 | 7,554 |
| Avg net price | $20,111 | $13,807 |
| Median earnings (10 yr)MIT reports higher median earnings | $143,372 | $124,080 |
| Graduation rate | 96% | 92% |
| Median debt | $14,768 | $12,000 |
| Economic mobility | 3.4% | 2.2% |
| Test policy | — | — |
| Type | Private (nonprofit) | Private (nonprofit) |
By the numbers MIT demonstrates superior long-term financial outcomes, with a 10-year median earnings figure of $143k versus Stanford's $124k. However, Stanford offers a lower average net price ($14k vs. $20k), resulting in a higher calculated value of 9.0x earnings per dollar of net price compared to MIT's 7.1x. MIT is also the clear leader in cultivating future scholars, with a future-scholar yield of 17.8 against Stanford's 9.1, and boasts a significantly higher economic-mobility rate (340% vs. 225%). Selectivity is virtually identical (MIT 5%, Stanford 4%; SAT 25-75th percentiles of 1520–1580 and 1510–1580, respectively), though MIT's admit-rate volatility is higher (72% vs. 42%). MIT has a slightly higher graduation rate (96% vs. 92%).
Where they overlap Both are globally preeminent, intensely selective research universities that attract highly motivated students. They are recognized for innovation, strength in STEM, and provide significant access to research and industry connections.
How they differ Culturally, MIT is known for its focused, problem-set-driven rigor and a collaborative residential system in an urban Boston setting. Its UROP program integrates research into the undergraduate experience. Stanford offers a broader academic range beyond core STEM, set in a sprawling suburban campus with a strong entrepreneurial culture. Student life narratives sometimes reference MIT's "IHTFP" and Stanford's "duck syndrome," hinting at different approaches to managing a high-pressure environment.
Figures are estimates compiled from public datasets (College Scorecard / IPEDS) and primary sources; verify with each institution before relying on them.
These outputs are estimates from a baseline model — not guarantees of admission, cost, or outcome.
| Location | Cambridge, MA | Stanford, CA |
|---|
Who each suits MIT suits students focused on fundamental science and engineering who thrive on concentrated, collaborative problem-solving. Stanford is a match for interdisciplinary innovators interested in pairing technical skills with fields like business, policy, or the arts, within a vibrant campus lifestyle.
Editorial overview — a qualitative summary of culture and fit, reviewed for accuracy. Not a ranking or a guarantee.